Opponents Of Obamacare = "GOP Thug"

I am sure you have heard the recent discourse on Obama's Nationalized Health Care plan. If not, check yourself. The volume and the discourse has recently been turned up to 11 as Congressmen return home to their districts in attempts to "sell the plan". Much to their dismay, they are being met by hundreds (soon to be thousands, maybe millions) of angry Americans who are letting their voices be heard. Here are a couple YouTube videos that exemplify the anger.

TIM BISHOP (NY-D) Part 1


TIM BISHOP (NY-D) Part 2


You can search the web and find many, many more examples of Congressmen who are having to 'face the music' in regard to the horrid plan that they have constructed.

However, the left wing lunatic fringe (Rachel Maddow in particular) has recently said that those who have met these Congressmen and voiced their concern (and anger) are "GOP Thugs" who have been hired by "lobbyists and Dick Armey". Are you upset by the prospect of having Nationalized Health Care? If you answer yes, then you are obviously a GOP Thug. Does that logic make any sense at all to you? Of course it doesn't. It was cooked up by a left wing LOON!!

The Lib-tards and Obama-trons will stop at NOTHING to get their programs enacted. They will marginalize, name call and question your intelligence all in the name of seeding the country over to government control. Maddow, Chris Mathews, Keith Olberman and MSNBC are just examples of the HACK liberal journalism that exists out there virtually everywhere. And it is very apparent that they and their liberal cohorts are incapable of understanding the grassroots revolution that is beginning to take place in this country. To suggest that the people who oppose Nationalized Health Care, Cap and Tax, et. al. are merely GOP whackos is to discount the very nature of the revolutionary spirit that this country was founded upon. Furthermore, are we not guaranteed our right to protest, to speak our minds and to petition the government? The Lib-tards seem to think that if the messiah speaks it, or if the liberals in Congress think it, then it MUST be good for the country. If they want to lay down (and I am sure that some of them "lay down" for just about anybody) for this administration, that is their business. However, to demean and insult the rest of us who do still believe in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence is a gross underestimation of this country's insight and voice.

Be silent NO MORE!!! Find out when your Congressman is planning to hold a townhall meeting and attend. If they are going to play coward (and many of them are planning to avoid the townhall meeting format), check this website and get involved. August 22 is the official date for the "RECESS RALLY". http://recessrally.com

REVOLUTION CALLING!!

RACISM and the DEMONCATS

Here is Boxer MARGINALIZING the CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce...


Can you believe that? This is the TYPICAL game plan for the Left Wing Loons. If you don't agree with them, they will disparage, marginalize and attempt to discredit you. Not to mention act in a condescending manner. The Left Wing believes that they OWN the struggles of minority groups, therefore it is they that can dish out the 'rights and wrongs' on all issues involving race. But the sad truth is that the DEMONCATS USE these groups (promising them EVERYTHING) and then discard them when they no longer serve the purpose of the 'Liberal Plan'. Don't believe that? Well, how many of the following anti-racial policies were authored or even supported by Liberals?

The Emancipation Proclamation
Anti-Jim Crow legislation
The Passage of the 14th Amendment
The Passage of the 15th Amendment
The Passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

If you go back and do a little 'fact-finding', you will find that DEMONCATS overwhelmingly OPPOSED ALL those pieces of legislation.

And just to throw some FACTS out there to the lunatic Liberal fringe, in the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933 a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes. It should be noted that Democrats held the White House from 1933 to 1952.

In short, ethnic minorities have been hijacked by the DEMONCATS and somehow convinced that the 'kindler and gentler' party somehow has their best interests in mind. Nothing could be further from the truth. Over the past five decades or more, African Americans have been used by the Democrat Party to win elections under the guise of the Party's support of civil rights. In reality, it is Republicans who have been responsible for most of the civil rights African Americans enjoy today.

And, lest we let BOXER off the hook (I refuse to call her 'Senator'--I hope she tries to ask me to call her that--NOT GONNA HAPPEN), here is another clip of her treating one of our decorated Army Generals with the typical Liberal version of 'respect'...


Here is Boxer DEGRADING a decorated Army General...


Oh but things could be worse...You could be married to this vicious, trite and ignorant gutter snipe. My thoughts and prayers to Mr. Boxer.

REVOLUTION CALLING!!

Health Care Cometh?

Ok, so I am gonna cheat a little bit. I was on one of my usual 'fact-finding missions' last night and this article regarding health care popped up. The article absolutely sickened me (the article is included below). So, I constructed an email and sent it to just about everyone I know, whether they be Conservative or Lib. I interjected my comments into the article for a play-by-play running conversation into the EVILS of the proposed plan. So, I give you the email (in all its glory) as well as the article with my comments included.

Enjoy. And prepare to feel nauseous. I think it is GUT-WRENCHING!!!

Here you go....



Folks...Pardon the interruption. But this was just one of those articles that HAD to go out to EVERYONE.

I am not in the business (maybe I should be) of trying to change anyone's mind about anything. However, I DO believe that one must have all the FACTS before making any decision. You are NOT getting all the FACTS if you are relying on the main-stream media, NPR or your local newspaper. FLAT OUT. Unless you are taking ALL sources of information from print, video and internet and weeding out the garbage, you are getting a half-truth. This is precisely what the leftists want. Better yet, they want you IN THE DARK. So, I decided to whip up a little EDITORIAL piece on an article that I found. Hopefully, it will open your eyes a little bit and get you to think about the dangerous path that we are currently on.

Please forward this on to anyone else that you think might need to hear the truth. Toss it out and smile pretty for the proletariat camera if you are already in the tank for Obummer (Obama-tron powers...ACTIVATE).

My editorial begins here....

Excuse me, sorry to be the HISTORY person in the room, but where, OH WHERE, does it say that health care is a RIGHT? Anyone? I know that this is what the 'revisionist', non-historical, left wing lunatic fringe WANTS the American 'sheeple' to believe. A RIGHT? Really? I suggest that you RE-READ the US Constitution (please pay close attention to the BILL OF RIGHTS) and see if you can find ANYTHING in that document that even eludes to government provided ANYTHING being a RIGHT.--By the way, THANKS Mr. Craven for inspiring me to study History. It is one of the greatest gifts anyone has ever given me.-- Now, you can LAY DOWN, swallow the $1.5 TRILLION price tag and continue to throw MORE of your hard earned dollars at Washington. OR, you can proudly stand up, throw off your financial CHAINS of oppression and say, "I'm mad as HELL, and I'm not gonna take it anymore!!"

And for those of you who still believe that taxes for those who make less that $250,000 won't go up to pay for this, well, I have some GREAT land in Florida for sale.

WAKE UP!!!

REVOLUTION CALLING!!!

cy

Here is the article...My comments are in italics


House rolls out plan to make health care a right
AP

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR and ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writers Ricardo Alonso-zaldivar And Erica Werner, Associated Press Writers – 3 mins ago

WASHINGTON – House Democrats on Tuesday rolled out a far-reaching $1.5 trillion plan that for the first time would make health care a right and a responsibility for all Americans, with medical providers, employers and the wealthiest picking up most of the tab.


The federal government would be responsible for ensuring that every person, regardless of income or the state of their health, has access to an affordable insurance plan. (this is called NATIONALIZED HEALTH CARE folks!!!) Individuals and employers would have new obligations to get coverage, or face hefty penalties.


Health care overhaul is President Barack Obama's top domestic priority, and his goal is to slow rising costs and provide coverage to nearly 50 million uninsured Americans.


Democratic leaders said they would push the measure through committee (meaning they won't be allowing BIPARTISAN alternatives) and toward a vote in the full House by month's end, while the pace of activity quickened on the other side of the Capitol.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he wanted floor debate to begin a week from Monday. Other officials said that timetable was likely to slip. Even so, it underscored a renewed sense of urgency.


The House legislation unveiled by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats would slow the growth of Medicare and Medicaid (those of you who are retired and receive these benefits have just had your care HIJACKED!!) payments to medical providers. From big hospitals to solo physician practices, providers also would be held to account for quality care, not just ordering up tests and procedures.


Insurance companies would be prohibited from denying coverage to the sick. The industry also would face stiff competition from a new government plan (so the government gets to be a 'player' and the 'referee'? Will one of you sports enthusiasts please tell me if you have ever seen a participant also be an official?) designed along the lines of Medicare.


The liberal-leaning plan lacked figures on total costs, but a House Democratic aide said the total bill would add up to about $1.5 trillion over 10 years. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private calculations. Most of the bill's costs come in the last five years after the 2012 presidential election.
(Gladly pay your Tuesday for a hamburger today!!)


The legislation calls for a 5.4 percent tax increase on individuals making more than $1 million a year, with a gradual tax beginning at $280,000 for individuals. Employers who don't provide coverage would be hit with a penalty equal to 8 percent of workers' wages with an exemption for small businesses. Individuals who decline an offer of affordable coverage would pay 2.5 percent of their incomes as a penalty, up to the average cost of a health insurance plan. (Freedom? Choices? Liberty? Forced to pay? Confiscatory penalties? The Soviet Union? Hmmmm)


With Obama pressing Congress to act on health care this summer, House leaders want to move their bill quickly through three committees and to a floor vote before the August congressional recess. But a group of moderate and conservative Democrats has withheld support, and no Republican votes are expected. (some people still have a sense of what's a 'right' and what is WRONG!!!)


The House bill seemed unlikely to win broad backing in the Senate, where the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee was expected to finish its version of the legislation Wednesday in what was looking to be a party-line vote. Another panel, the Senate Finance Committee, was striving to unveil a bill by the end of the week.


Standing before a banner that read "Quality Affordable Care for the Middle Class," Pelosi, D-Calif., called the moment "historic and transformative." The bill would provide "stability and peace of mind" by braking costs and guaranteeing coverage, she said.


"We are going to accomplish what many people felt wouldn't happen in our lifetime," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif. (what does Energy and Commerce have to do with Health Care? Does this guy think he is going to finally get that free nose job or something?), one of the main sponsors. Obama, who issued a statement hailing the measure, plans to keep up the pressure on Congress by delivering remarks in the Rose Garden on Wednesday.


Speaking in Warren, Mich., where he was promoting new spending (MORE spending? Does it ever end?) for community colleges, Obama anticipated a congressional confrontation over health care.


"There's going to be a major debate over the next three weeks," he said, deviating from his prepared text. "And don't be fooled by folks trying to scare you saying we can't change the health care system.We have no choice but to change the health care system because right now it's broken for too many Americans."


Separately, Obama spoke by telephone with Sen. Charles Grassley, the Iowa Republican viewed as critical to the fate of bipartisan negotiations in the Senate.


House Democrats said the income tax increase in their bill would apply only to the top 1.2 percent of households, those who earn about one-quarter of all income. The wealthiest 4 percent of small business owners would be among them. The tax would start at 1 percent for couples making $350,000 and individuals earning $280,000, ramp up to 1.5 percent above $500,000 of income, and jump to 5.4 percent for those earning above $1 million. (Again, if you believe this, well, you need to have your head re-examined. They will continue to lower that threshold more and more when they figure out that they won't be able to make ends meet. They will only be happy until ALL of us are paying for this 'pipe dream'.)


The tax would raise an estimated $544 billion over 10 years. (but I thought the total price of the bill was $1.5 TRILLION? Is that Obummer Math or something?)


Business groups and the insurance industry immediately assailed the legislation. In a letter to lawmakers, major business organizations branded the 1,000-page bill a job-killer. Its coverage mandate would automatically raise the cost of hiring a new worker, they said. (again, someone is actually THINKING about the long-term affects here)


"Exempting some micro-businesses will not prevent this provision from killing many jobs," the letter said. "Congress should allow market forces and employer autonomy to determine what benefits employers provide, rather than deciding by fiat."


The business groups also warned that the U.S. health care system could be damaged by adding a government-run insurance plan and a federal council that would make some decisions on benefits, as called for in the legislation. Thirty-one organizations signed the letter, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable representing top corporate CEOs and the National Retail Federation. (so is the Chamber of Commerce some right-wing hate group now who is unconcerned with those who cannot afford health insurance? Watch the name-calling and the marginalization of this group begin........)


The House bill would change the way individuals and many employers get health insurance. It would set up a new national purchasing pool, called an exchange. The exchange would offer a menu of plans, with different levels of coverage. A government plan would be among the options, and the exchange would eventually be open to most employers. Insurers say that combination would drive many of them out of business since the public plan would be able to offer lower premiums to virtually all Americans. (and this is a good thing? The government is on the record as saying that it will bring "competition" back to health insurance. This is competition? Someone FAILED Economics 101)


But backers of a public plan — including Obama — say it would provide healthy competition for the insurance industry. (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....see above)


Under the House bill, the government would provide subsidies (that means MORE taxes for you and I to pay) to make coverage more affordable for households with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level, or $88,000 for a family of four and $43,000 for an individual. Medicaid — the federal-state health program for the poor — would be expanded to individuals and families up to 133 percent of the poverty line. About 17 million people would remain uninsured — about 6 percent of the population — and half of them would be illegal immigrants. ($1.7 TRILLION to insure about 28 million people? Are you kidding me? Again, the government's use of PUBLIC funds here is INEFFICIENT. What else is new?)


The legislation also would improve the Medicare prescription drug benefit by gradually reducing a coverage gap known as the 'doughnut hole.'


The individual and employer coverage requirements would raise about $192 billion over 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office said.


Even before the bill was unveiled, the House Ways and Means Committee announced it would vote on the proposal beginning on Thursday. The panel is one of three that must act before the bill can go to the full House, probably later in the month.


Some House Democrats privately have expressed concern that they will be required to vote on higher taxes, only to learn later that the Senate does not intend to follow through with legislation of its own. That would leave rank-and-file House Democrats up for re-election next year in the uncomfortable position of having to explain their vote on a costly bill that never reached Obama's desk or became law. (say bye-bye. 2010 will be the end of this mindless insanity and 2012 will put the nail in the Obama-tron's casket. The question is, can we hold out until then?)




"In time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
---George Orwell

R.I.P.

Admit it...We DO live in a POP CULTURE nation. As much as it might work to the detriment of our nation and as trivial as “whose got the #1 record in the nation” is, we ARE (sometimes to a fault) tied into what happens to our ‘pop icons’.

Let’s forget for a moment what the lasting legacy that this ‘pop society’ means to us as we go forward in our great nation. Let’s instead, focus on the obvious for a moment.

Let’s look at the rash of recent passings and simply try to remember--whether you ‘liked’ these people or not or whether you believed that they ‘contributed’ in a positive way to our society--that they were VERY important people to many people. Let’s remember that these people were fathers or mothers, aunts or uncles, brothers or sisters, sons or daughters. Their passings mean that friends and family are suffering the loss of a loved one. They are trying to put the pieces of their lives back together and trying to fill a void that has been left by their loss.

And, let us pray.

Godspeed.


Ed McMahon (June 23)--Johnny Carson side-kick from 1962-1992
Farrah Fawcett (June 24)--Actress most remembered for 'Charlie's Angels'
Michael Jackson (June 24)--The King of Pop
Billy Mays (June 28)--Infomercial King
Karl Malden (July 1)--Actor most remembered for American Express' "Don't Leave Home Without It"
David Carradine (June 3)--Actor most remembered for "Kung Fu"
Steve McNair (July 4)--Tennessee Titans and Baltimore Ravens QB
Robert MnNamara (July 6)--not a 'pop' icon--Defense Secretary during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations

A Moment Of Silence On Independence Day...

Ragged Old Flag


I walked through a county courthouse square,
On a park bench an old man was sitting there.
I said, "Your old courthouse is kinda run down."
He said, "Naw, it'll do for our little town."
I said, "Your old flagpole has leaned a little bit,
And that's a Ragged Old Flag you got hanging on it."

He said, "Have a seat," and I sat down.
"Is this the first time you've been to our little town?"
I said, "I think it is." He said, "I don't like to brag,
But we're kinda proud of that Ragged Old Flag.

"You see, we got a little hole in that flag there when
Washington took it across the Delaware.
And it got powder-burned the night Francis Scott Key
Sat watching it writing Say Can You See.
And it got a bad rip in New Orleans
With Packingham and Jackson tuggin' at its seems.

"And it almost fell at the Alamo
Beside the Texas flag, but she waved on though.
She got cut with a sword at Chancellorsville
And she got cut again at Shiloh Hill.
There was Robert E. Lee, Beauregard, and Bragg,
And the south wind blew hard on that Ragged Old Flag.

"On Flanders Field in World War I
She got a big hole from a Bertha gun.
She turned blood red in World War II.
She hung limp and low by the time it was through.
She was in Korea and Vietnam.
She went where she was sent by her Uncle Sam.

"She waved from our ships upon the briny foam,
And now they've about quit waving her back here at home.
In her own good land here she's been abused --
She's been burned, dishonored, denied, and refused.

"And the government for which she stands
Is scandalized throughout the land.
And she's getting threadbare and wearing thin,
But she's in good shape for the shape she's in.
'Cause she's been through the fire before
And I believe she can take a whole lot more.

"So we raise her up every morning, take her
down every night.
We don't let her touch the ground and we fold
her up right.
On second thought, I do like to brag,
'Cause I'm mighty proud of the Ragged Old Flag."

John R. Cash 1974

Think about what our flag stands for.
Think about the men and women who have given their lives to defend it.
Think about how lucky we are to live in the free-est country on the planet.
Think about the sacrifices of the generations before us.
Think about what it means to be an American.
Hopefully you can be proud this 4th of July.

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY

"Oh Say Can You See..."

Happy Independence Day!! Thank the Lord that we live in the free-est, most democratic nation (still) on earth. Thank God that we live in a land where our rights are (still) protected and that all people are given the opportunities to make something of themselves in our society.

Now, for the latest issue concerning YOU and ME this 4th of July...

Take cover my friends, Kim Jung Il has vowed to launch (test) rockets AT the state of Hawaii on the 4th of July. This AFTER North Korea has threatened to 'weaponize' its supplies of plutonium (used in manufacturing nuclear weapons), violated a United Nations resolution by allegedly 'moving' rocket parts, nuclear technology or other sensitive material to other countries in the region (the USS John McCain is in pursuit), AND calling President 'Obummer' (and the United States) out by saying, "If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all." Obummer's reaction? Wait for it...Wait for it...Wait for it...NOTHING!! No condemnation, no ramping up the rhetoric (where the HELL is Ronald Reagan when you need him) and little discussion to the American people about quelling fears or doubt. Nope. Instead, he had a luau at the White House and threw softballs at the dunk tank. Seriously? Do you people still believe that this guy is competent to serve as our President? Do you believe that he has the SAFETY of our nation as his primary role? Or is he MORE concerned with getting some kind of socialist agenda passed (nationalized health care, cap and trade, and amnesty).

So, this 4th of July, make sure you keep your head down and stay close to your bomb shelter.

"And the rockets red glare, the bombs bursting in air..."

REVOLUTION CALLING

Comparisons Are Sometimes UNDENIABLE

I was cruising through YouTube the other day and found a couple videos that I thought were, well, interesting. WATCH THEM BOTH and decide for yourself...

The 'original'...



And now, for a 'modernized' version...



ANY QUESTIONS?

REVOLUTION CALLING!!!

"Sunshine Is The Best Disinfectant" (Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis)

I'm on a roll...2 entries in LESS than 24 hours...Don't stop me now...

Ann Ryand’s book “Atlas Shrugged” begins with the famous line, “Who is Jon Galt?” The question today should be, “Who is Gerald Walpin?”

The answer? Well, Walpin WAS the inspector general for the Corporation for National Community Service, another “community organizing program” created in 1993. According to their own website (http://www.nationalservice.gov/about/role_impact/history.asp), the CNCS hopes to “connect Americans of all ages and backgrounds with opportunities to give back to their communities and their nation”. Sound legitimate and noble enough. Right? Well, as with ALL the other legislation, bailouts and hair-brained schemes that this administration cooks up, this story of the firing of Walpin smells (like an onion) the more you peel away the veneer.

For those who do not know, an Inspector General is a high ranking official charged with the mission to inspect and report on some bodies in their field of competency within the Federal government. In other words, they are a ‘watchdog’ for the taxpayers and citizens of this country. Federally, there are 64 Offices of Inspectors General and their activities include the detection and prevention of fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement of the government programs and operations within their parent organizations. The positions are generally believed to be non-partisan. However, they do answer to Congress and the White House.

Last Wednesday night, Inspector General Gerald Walpin was fired. And NOBODY is talking about this as anything except that it is ‘just another day in Obama-land’. Walpin was fired, according to the letter written by Obama, because he (Obama) had “lost faith” in Walpin’s ability to do his job. Now what does that mean? Well, could it have something to do with the fact that Walpin had discovered that a well-known Obama ‘hack’ (Sacramento’s own mayor Kevin Johnson) had been misappropriating CNCS funds ($800 million of YOUR tax dollars)?

Walpin found that Johnson and St. HOPE had failed to use the federal money they received for the purposes specified in a grant and had also used federally-funded AmeriCorps staff for, among other things, "driving [Johnson] to personal appointments, washing his car, and running personal errands." Walpin came to the conclusion that Johnson and St. HOPE should be subject to suspension and debarment. In September 2008, the order was given to suspend future grants to St. Hope, with the distinct possibility that it would lead to a permanent debarment from receiving future federal funds. Walpin’s investigation could have led to Johnson being barred from EVER winning another federal grant or might have prevented Sacramento from receiving its part of billions of dollars in federal stimulus money.

Enter our hero, BARRY SOTERO. Before the suspension or debarment could go through, Walpin was FIRED. The firing is par for the course for this administration; “Don’t like it? You’re gone. Don’t approve? You’re gone. QUESTION MY AUTHORITY? You’re gone.” However, BARRY SOTERO has really stepped in it with this one. The firing may have been ILLEGAL. Under rules and regulations passed just last year by (Democrat-led) Congress, inspectors generals MUST be given 30 days notice of their impending termination AND the president MUST outline, in specific detail, why they want the offending inspector general fired. Neither of these has taken place.

Does BARRY really believe that he can operate outside the law? Well, as long as his ‘cult of personality’ continues and there are those who view him and his ‘lunatic fringe’ policies as both saviors of the American way of life, the pain will continue.

Here you can find your ray of sunshine…AND your DISINFECTANT!!

REVOLUTION CALLING!!

Perez Hilton, David Letterman and the LEFT'S Politics of HATE

It's been a while since my last post. I have been trying to digest all the dogma, insincerity, and overall LUNACY that has befallen our country, our society and our political system. Here are my latest thoughts.

HYPOCRISY--Is the act of being less critical of oneself than of others.

This is the left's gravy train. As the common viewer (and average learner) have come to find out, the left isn't about 'equal opportunity' or 'equal treatment' FOR ALL PEOPLE. They are ELITISTS and work very hard to disparage and marginalize ANYONE (from VP candidate to Miss California) who doesn't agree with their particular views. Their public attacks on those who question their positions and beliefs are akin to a verbal blitzkrieg where NOTHING is sacred and ALL are beaten, brutalized and broken-boned (verbally).

First case in point. Carrie Prejean, now 'former' Miss California. At the Miss Universe pageant in April, Miss Prejean did not give the answer that an openly gay judge (Perez Hilton) expected or thought were appropriate. For those out of the loop, Hilton asked Prejean, "Vermont recently became the 4th state to legalize same sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suite, why or why not?" Prejean's answer was articulate and demonstrative to her core values ("We live in a nation that gives people choice, however, I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman"). While we may never truly know if this answer cost her the crown (Hilton scored her answer a ZERO), we do know what Hilton's response to her answer was just by perusing the blogosphere the following day. In an interview, Hilton called Miss Prejean "a dumb bitch" and even referred to her as "a c%#t" on his very own blog page. Now I ask you, is that the language of a group of people who are 'concerned' about the welfare of ALL human beings? And one really needs to ask WHY Hilton needed to refer to her in such a mysogynistic fashion. Where is NOW or the ACLU when you need them? HAHA. Of course we know where they are.



By the way, apparently there were 4 guys on the judges panel for Miss Universe who were gay. When did a gay man become a better judge of HOT-NESS than a straight man? Just asking. Isn't that like asking a lesbian to judge a Chip And Dale's 'dance off'?

Point Two. David Letterman. Good God, the bucktooth lame-brain was at it again last week sharing his brand of 'humor' with his band of mindless, starstuck auto-matons. Again, forgive me for having to recall the facts, but some folks DO live under a rock. On his program last Monday night, Letterman said this: "There was hold up during the Yankee game the other night. Sarah Palin's daughter, during the 7th inning, was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez." And then on Tuesday (and I didn't even know about this one when I began this post) he said: "The toughest part of her [Palin's] trip to NY was keeping Elliot Spitzer away from her daughter." This is a 62 year old man talking about a 14 year old adolescent girl folks. Now again, are these comments humorous? Better question, ARE THEY APPROPRIATE? Whether or not you agree with Letterman's brand of brainless humor is beside the point here. The REAL point is that, like Hilton, Letterman participates in the sniping, politics of HATE that EVERY left-wing loon finds solace in. The mindless, sophomoric game plan of marginalization of candidates/celebrities (of the conservative movement--neither would have ANYTHING negative to say about Barry Sotero, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank or any of the other windchime, incense burining crew) and ramp up other vicious verbal attacks by less-known media personalities. Do you think Letterman has 'inspired' a small segment of society to believe that statutory rape is OK? Do you think he might have somehow encouraged others in the media to also 'try' and be cute by laying the smack-eth down on one of Palin's children? What's next Letterman? Jokes about Trigg Palin who has Downs Syndrome? Let's hope not, but I wouldn't put it past him.

One last comment on the Letterman-thing...The New York Times has 'covered' the joke up by NOT posting it as part of the show's transcript. Embarrassment? Disgrace? Or HIDING the TRUTH so that others cannot judge for themselves. YOU decide.

So you see, the people on the left ARE mean-spirited, intolerant and hateful. They take every opportunity to spew their gut-wrenching ugliness on all of us. And then, when of course mainstream America calls them on it, they use some kind of excuse about how they were 'misquoted', 'misunderstood' or how by them being put on the spot is part of some 'right-wing' conspiracy.

BOTTOM LINE...You can't have it both ways. If you are going to spread your disease of HATE, you have to be willing to accept that you might become a target of that same disease as well.

REVOLUTION CALLING!!

Red & Blue States: Economic Forecasting Made Easy

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released unemployment rates for March 2009 to ‘non-existent’ media attention (more on that some other time). And guess what? The HIGHEST rates of unemployment in the country are found in BLUE (that’s democrat/progressive) states. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98569

Now, what can we extrapolate or forecast by these numbers? This one is easy. If your state is dominated by dems/progs, you have a better than 50-50 chance that your state will, if it isn’t already, operate in the RED. That means that your state will essentially HAVE to cut programs in order to ‘balance the budget’. Where will those cuts come? That will depend on your left-wing loon state legislature.

For example, look at California and its “Govern-ator” (Yah, I’ll crush you with my large biceps until you wail like a little girly man). They are trying to balance the budget by selling San Quentin (a state prison), legalizing the recreational use of marijuana (as a source of tax revenue), and lay off some 50,000 teachers and release ‘non-violent’ inmates from CA prisons. http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/12307/

What? Yes. As the Metallica song says, Sad But True.

So, where is our country headed under the current progressive leadership in Congress and in the White House? You need look no farther than ‘The Golden State’ for an example. Unable to fund the out of control spending by a left-wing loon state legislature, the state is on the verge of bankruptcy. Things have gotten so bad in CA that the state is having an increasingly difficult time selling its bonds to prospective investors (including other U.S. state governments). The state of CA has solved this problem by selling the bonds to the Bay Area Toll Authority (owned by the state). CA’s credit rating has been downgraded from A+ to just plain A, the LOWEST bond rating in the country. An honor CA shares with Louisiana. Can you smell economic MELDOWN?

So, as long as Congress and the Dali-Bama are going to spend OUR hard-earned tax dollars on meaningless programs (you don’t really want me to list them all do you?), we are headed for the economic abyss. Hopefully, your state is taking measures now to insulate itself from the long arm of the Federal government by signing on to the Patrick Henry Foundation, a 10^th Amendment group who opposes the ultra micro-managing coming from Washington, DC. And, hopefully, your state will be changing its color in 2010.

Have YOU Been Identified?

Something happened recently that concerns all those who 'study' history. You may or may not be familiar with the Department of Homeland Security's issuance of 'The Right-Wing Extremist Report' or the subsequent 'Lexicon of Domestic Extremists'. If not, here's the skinny.

Janet Napolitano and DHS (Dept. of Homeland Security) has spent sometime identifying those people who they consider a threat to the safety and security of this country. A reasonable job for such an office? You bet. The only problem is, those on the list are AMERICANS. What? Believe it. Identified and named on the list are those who support anti-abortion legislation, oppose gun control, oppose gay marriage, favor more border security or who have participated in recent anti-tax rallies (the TEA Parties on April 15). Still don't believe it? Here's the link. See for yourself. http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf.

But the idiocy doesn't stop there. DHS issued the 'Lexicon of Domestic Extremists' a few days later and identified EXACTLY what they meant in the previous Right-Wing Extremist Report. Inluded in the lexicon are groups like 'Christian patriots, Constitutionalists, anti-immigration groups (like those who oppose giving illegals driver's licences), and the Sovereign Citizens Movement'. Here is the link for you to see. http://video1.washingtontimes.com/video/lexicon.pdf

Now, why should this concern YOU? And what of the 'Historical' importance of this event (as I mentioned above? Well, about 80 years ago in a land far away, there was a dictator who knew that there were those who would oppose his every move once they figured out what his real intentions were. So, he organized a private police force to be run by the government (him) and set about identifying those 'groups' that he knew would balk at his proposals. This group was given the authority to investigae cases regarding treason, espionage and sabotage but was also given the power to imprison people without judicial proceedings. No one thought the lesser of it, and, in time, the group became a public fixture. The group began by 'identifying' so-called 'enemies of the state' but soon, these people were not just being identified. They were being identified and led off to camps, which were also under the control of this police force.

Still curious as to the Historical importance?

Well, the description that I have just given is a general outline of Hitler's Gestapo which was born in 1933 and was a source of fear, hate and depravity in Nazi Germany throughout WWII.

Can you see why "identifying" citizens of this country (which in itself is a violation of the Constitution) is a dangerous game? Can you see how this game of identification can soon be turned into a game of removal of Constitutional rights (like due process and habeus corpus)? Can you see that it is time for all of we Americans to start paying attention to this two-bit dictator who occupies the White House?

If you don't see the logic in this, the Historical parallels or the can of worms that this issue opens, then you are either a closet Nazi, or a person who didn't pay attention in History class.

REVOLUTION CALLING!!

Tired? Me Too

Are you tired? Tired of watching the greatest country in the world nosedive into obscurity? Tired of watching an under-qualified, second-rate community organizer make unbelievable, unintelligent decisions regarding the future of this nation? Are you tired of seeing the morality of our society continually high-jacked by the 'politically correct', 'do it if it feels good' crowd? Do you wonder where our leaders are?

If you can answer yes to these questions, you are not alone. I started this blog to deal with the insanity that is American politics today. As we see our government (and Mr. Obama) ring up huge deficits, turn their collective backs on the common citizen and ignore the wishes and demands of the silent majority, we (that is you and me) need to take a little bit more of 'aggressive' action.

I will be commenting on some (there is not enough time in the day to deal with all of it) of the ridiculous nonsense that is being shoved down our throats and, of course, putting my own little spin on it.

Your comments are encouraged.

Join the DEFIANCE!!!